Another thing wrong with The Da Vinci Code
posted by Patrick at 12:58 PM
Thursday, March 30, 2006
About Me
- Name: Patrick
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
A red state Canadian-born fellow living in blue state California. Married to an Inca princess who bore us a growing passel 'o bebitas. Work at Catholic Answers as host of the NUMBER-ONE RATED CATHOLIC BROADCAST IN AMERICA (shameless plug) heard Monday to Friday 6-9PM EST at www.catholic.com, on Channel 160 on Sirius/XM Satellite, or check your local listings. Belong by adoption to a certain Someone who created all things visible and invisible.
Previous Posts
- Pope to China: love you love time
- Chubby naked Venezuelans gross out onlookers
- Rivers o ' green
- That'll learn them stupid cops
- I'm going to be a father again
- Something I've noticed
- Orwell on crack
- Media bias? What media bias?
- First Bareback Mounthim, now this
- And to dust we shall return
3 Comments:
I have to disagree. Hanks is sporting the liberal white male mid-life crisis shoulder length hair cut. It's actually perfect for portraying a professor.
A true mullet is short on top with the only the hair on the back of the hair grown out.
10:27 AM
Ouch! Make that,
A true mullet is short on top with the hair on the back of the head grown out.
10:30 AM
Joe: A case could be made that Hanks' character is not in full-blown mulletude, but it IS bighair that extends down to the collar at the back,; in his case almost like a ski racing helmet.
But I think you're all wet (sans shampoo) on what a true mullet is. The common definition is broader than that, per right this way:
http://www.mulletlovers.com/
See the shame link.
Can you believe we're even talking about this? It's so.....Eighties!
8:04 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home